Retro/pcjs
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked pcjs
 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
pcjs/disks/dec/rl02k/xxdp/ekbbf0/README.md
Jeff Parsons 16a78693e8 More scripting fixes
2017-02-06 17:37:12 -08:00

264 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

---
layout: page
title: "EKBBF0: 11/70 MEMORY MANAGEMENT DIAGNOSTIC (PART 2)"
permalink: /disks/dec/rl02k/xxdp/ekbbf0/
---
EKBBF0: 11/70 CPU DIAGNOSTIC (PART 2)
-------------------------------------
From the
[PDP-11 Diagnostic Handbook (1988)](http://archive.pcjs.org/pubs/dec/pdp11/diags/PDP11_DiagnosticHandbook_1988.pdf),
p. 1-7:
11/70 CPU DIAGNOSTIC PART 2
ABSTRACT:
This diagnostic is the second part of the 11/70 CPU, it tests advanced
instructions and miscellaneous logic.
OPERATING PROCEDURES:
Set the switch register by <CONTROL P> (RD console)
CON = xxxxxxWZ
(W = deposit xxxxxx into console switch register)
(R = read and type console switch settings)
(Z = switch console terminal back to program)
.R EKBBF0
SWITCH SETTINGS
SW15 = 1 halt on error
SW14 = 1 loop on test
SW13 = 1 inhibit error typeouts
SW12 = 1 inhibit T-bit trapping
SW11 = 1 inhibit iterations
SW10 = 1 ring bell on error
SW09 = 1 loop on error
SW08 = 1 loop on test in SWR <07:00>
SW07 = 1 not used
SW06 = 1 skip bus request 6 test
SW05 = 1 skip bus request 5 test
SW04 = 1 skip bus request 4 test
SW02 = 1 test selector (with switch 8)
SW01 = 1 test selector (with switch 8)
SW00 = 1 skip operator intervention testing
When I first ran this diagnostic in PDPjs, it failed a few tests:
CEKBBF0 11/70 CPU #2
A
SCCE STACK OVERFLOW NOT GOING HIGH OR
NOT GETTING TO TMCD E31 OR E31 BAD
ERRORPC TEST NUMBER
020646 000040
CPU UNDER TEST FOUND TO BE A KB11-B/C OR KB11-CM
TMCA E67(8) NOT GETTING TO E76(13) OR E76 IS BAD
ERRORPC TEST NUMBER
026030 000063
After setting a breakpoint at 020646 and then dumping the instruction history buffer when it was hit:
>> bp 020646
bp 020646 set
>> g
bp 020646 hit
stopped (18110643 instructions, 86218232 cycles, 12936 ms, 6664984 hz)
R0=177777 R1=032435 R2=152110 R3=000024 R4=153352 R5=001164
SP=001076 PC=020646 PS=000000 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
020646: 104241 EMT 241
>> dh 22 22
020404: 012767 021136 160656 MOV #21136,001270 ;history=22
020412: 012767 020450 160466 MOV #20450,001106 ;history=21
020420: 013767 177776 160542 MOV @#177776,001170 ;history=20
020426: 032737 000020 177776 BIT #20,@#177776 ;history=19
020434: 001405 BEQ 020450 ;history=18
020450: 012737 000340 000006 MOV #340,@#6 ;history=17
020456: 012767 020472 160424 MOV #20472,001110 ;history=16
020464: 012737 020530 000024 MOV #20530,@#24 ;history=15
020472: 012737 020546 000004 MOV #20546,@#4 ;history=14
020500: 012706 000336 MOV #336,SP ;history=13
020504: 012700 177777 MOV #177777,R0 ;history=12
020510: 010016 MOV R0,@SP ;history=11
020546: 023727 000000 020512 CMP @#0,#20512 ;history=10
020554: 001407 BEQ 020574 ;history=9
020574: 022737 177777 000336 CMP #177777,@#336 ;history=8
020602: 001003 BNE 020612 ;history=7
020612: 012767 020620 160270 MOV #20620,001110 ;history=6
020620: 012737 020650 000004 MOV #20650,@#4 ;history=5
020626: 012706 177776 MOV #177776,SP ;history=4
020632: 005016 CLR @SP ;history=3
020634: 012706 001076 MOV #1076,SP ;history=2
020640: 012737 032636 000004 MOV #32636,@#4 ;history=1
020646: 104241 EMT 241
The closest we have to a source code listing of the EKBBF0 diagnostic comes from some
[scanned microfiche](http://archive.pcjs.org/pubs/dec/pdp11/diags/AC-7966F-MC_CEKBBF0_1170_CPU_2_May80.pdf)
on [bitsavers.org](http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/microfiche/ftp.j-hoppe.de/bw/gh/) for:
PRODUCT CODE: AC-7966F-MC
PRODUCT NAME: CEKBBF0 11/70 CPU #2
DATE CREATED: MAY, 1980
MAINTAINER: DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING
The source code listing for TEST 40 matches the code above, and begins at the same address (020402):
;;***************************************************************
;*TEST 40 RED ZONE TRAP
;*
;* A RED ZONE TRAP IS FIRST ATTEMPTED WITH THE SP AT 336.
;* IF BEN13 FAILS EXECUTION WILL GO TO EITHER BRK.80 OR BRK.20
;* OR PUP.00.
;* BRK.80 WILL CAUSE THE OLD PSW AND PC TO BE STACKED ON THE
;* OLD STACK INSTEAD OF LOCATIONS 2 AND 0.
;* BRK.20 WILL MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THE RED ZONE FAILED.
;* PUP.00 WILL CAUSE A TRAP TO LOCATION 24.
;*
;* IF THE PROCESSOR FAILS TO TRAP EITHER TMCD SL RED IS
;* NOT GOING LOW OR TMCC ABORT IS NOT GOING LOW.
;*
;* IF UBCB ABOTR RESTART FAILS TO GO LOW OR E10(13)
;* IS BAD THE PROCESSOR WILL HANG IN THE PAUSE STATE.
;;***************************************************************
TST40: SCOPE
MOV #TST41,NEXTTST ;SAVE ADDRESS OF NEXT TEST
MOV #14$,$LPADR ;SETUP LOOP ADR
MOV @#PSW,$TMP3 ;SAVE PSW
BIT #BIT4,@#PSW ;IS T BIT ON?
BEQ 14$ ;BRANCH IF NO
MOV #PR7,-(SP) ;PUT NEW PSW ON STACK
MOV #14$,-(SP) ;PUT RETURN ADR ON STACK
RTT ;TURN T BIT OFF
14$: MOV #PR7,@#ERRVEC+2 ;RESTORE ERRVEC PSW
MOV #64$,$LPERR ;SETUP ERROR LOOP
MOV #3$,@#PWRVEC ;SETUP LOCATION 24
64$: MOV #1$,@#ERRVEC ;SETUP ERRVEC
MOV #336,SP ;SET THE SP TO RED ZONE
MOV #-1,R0 ;SETUP R0
MOV R0,(SP) ;EXECUTE THE TRAP INSTRUCTION
6$: MOV #STACK,SP ;RESET THE SP
MOV #CPUSPUR,@#ERRVEC ;RESTORE ERRVEC
ERROR 235 ;RED ZONE REFERENCE FAILED TO TRAP
BR 8$
3$: MOV #STACK,SP ;RESET THE SP
MOV #CPUSPUR,@#ERRVEC ;RESTORE LOCATION 4
ERROR 237 ;BEN 13 FAILED TO PUP.00
BR 8$
1$: CMP @#0,#6$ ;DID BEN 13 FAIL?
BEQ 7$ ;BRANCH IF NO
MOV #STACK,SP ;RESET THE SP
MOV #CPUSPUR,@#ERRVEC ;RESTORE ERRVEC
ERROR 240 ;BEN 13 FAILED TO BRK.80
BR 8$
7$: CMP #-1,@#336 ;;DID YEL ZONE OCCUR?
BNE 8$ ;BRANCH IF NO
CLR @#336 ;SETUP FOR LOOPING
ERROR 251 ;YEL ZONE IN RED REGION
;
;TEST TO ENSURE PSW REFERENCE VIA THE SP CAUSES A RED ZONE TRAP
8$: MOV #63$,$LPERR ;SETUP ERROR LOOP
63$: MOV #4$,@#ERRVEC ;SETUP ERRVEC
MOV #PSW,SP ;PUT ADDRESS OF PSW IN SP
CLR (SP) ;EXECUTE THE TRAP CAUSING INSTRUCTION
MOV #1076,SP ;RESET THE SP
MOV #CPUSPUR,@#ERRVEC ;RESTORE ERRVEC
ERROR 241 ;NO RED ZONE ON STACK OVERFLOW
PDPjs was failing to trigger a RED stack violation on this instruction:
R0=177777 R1=032435 R2=152110 R3=000024 R4=153352 R5=001164
SP=177776 PC=020632 PS=000350 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N1 Z0 V0 C0
020632: 005016 CLR @SP ;cycles=7
so execution fell into `ERROR 241`. This was resolved by updating the *checkStackLimit1145()* function
in [cpustate.js](/modules/pdp11/lib/cpustate.js) to include stack addresses >= 177776 in the RED stack
overflow range test.
The next test that PDPjs failed was TEST 63, which also matches the source code listing in the above microfiche,
and begins at the same address (031532):
;;***************************************************************
;*TEST 63 WAIT
;*
;* THIS TEST ENSURES THAT THE WAIT INSTRUCTION WORKS PROPERLY.
;* IT FIRST EXECUTES WITH A LEVEL 4 INTERRUPT.
;* THEN THE T BIT IS ENABLED TO ENSURE THAT THE INTERRUPT
;* OCCURS AND NOT THE T BIT TRAP.
;;***************************************************************
TST63: SCOPE
MOV #TST64,NEXTTST ;SAVE ADDRESS OF NEXT TEST
MOV #^D1990,$ICNT ;ADJUST ITTERATION COUNT
MOV #10$,$LPADR ;SETUP LOOP ADR
10$: MOV #2$,@#TPVEC ;SETUP TELEPRINTER VECTOR
MOV #1$,$LPERR ;SETUP ERROR LOOP
1$: MOV #STACK,SP ;INITIALIZE THE SP
SPL 3
MOV #BIT6,@$TPS ;SET PRINTER INTERRUPT FLAG
MOV #15,@$TPB ;SEND CHARACTER
WAIT ;EXECUTE INSTRUCTION UNDER TEST
;FAILURE
CLR @$TPS ;CLEAR INTERR ENABLE BIT
ERROR 377 ;WAIT INSTRUCTION DID NOT
BR 5$ ;WAIT FOR INTERRUPT
After setting and hitting a breakpoint at 031532, we can step through the instructions in this test:
bp 031532 hit
stopped (37666352 instructions, 181205851 cycles, 27294 ms, 6639036 hz)
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031532 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031532: 012767 032024 147530 MOV #32024,001270
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031540 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031540: 012767 003706 147336 MOV #3706,001104 ;cycles=16
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031546 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031546: 012767 031554 147332 MOV #31554,001106 ;cycles=16
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031554 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031554: 012737 031624 000064 MOV #31624,@#64 ;cycles=16
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031562 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031562: 012767 031570 147320 MOV #31570,001110 ;cycles=16
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=031570 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031570: 012706 001100 MOV #1100,SP ;cycles=16
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001100 PC=031574 PS=010340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031574: 000233 SPL 003 ;cycles=7
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001100 PC=031576 PS=010140 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031576: 012777 000100 147336 MOV #100,@001142 ;cycles=5
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001100 PC=031604 PS=010140 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
031604: 012777 000015 147332 MOV #15,@001144 ;cycles=20
>> tr
trapped to 100 (INTERRUPT)
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=026020 PS=000340 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z0 V0 C0
026020: 005077 153212 CLR @001236 ;cycles=0
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=026024 PS=000344 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z1 V0 C0
026024: 005037 177772 CLR @#177772 ;cycles=19
>> tr
R0=000000 R1=000102 R2=000000 R3=000000 R4=000000 R5=026642
SP=001074 PC=026030 PS=000344 IR=000000 SL=000377 T0 N0 Z1 V0 C0
026030: 104324 EMT 324 ;cycles=16
Vector 100 is for the KW11 Line Clock -- an interrupt that the test was apparently not expecting. It
was instead looking for an interrupt from the DL11 "teleprinter" device.
This failure was resolved by fixing the KW11 logic to clear any pending Line Clock interrupt whenever the
KW11 Interrupt Enable bit was cleared.
Reference in a new issue View git blame Copy permalink