From eb0eb10044e2a64ccfc645fe35c9303362a09ff2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Parsons Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:42:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] More explanatory blog text --- blog/2015/07/17/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/2015/07/17/README.md b/blog/2015/07/17/README.md index e94856a97..15ab7a8e7 100644 --- a/blog/2015/07/17/README.md +++ b/blog/2015/07/17/README.md @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Then I ran into a couple of Windows 95 oddities. First, some kernel initializat executed an invalid opcode (0x0F,0xFF) and expected its DPMI exception (0x06) handler to field the exception; that was fixed by flagging the opcode as genuinely invalid. -> ** SIDEBAR ** +> SIDEBAR > By default, PCjs marks opcodes as invalid *only* if they have been confirmed invalid. PCjs considers the vast majority of unused/undocumented opcodes to be merely "undefined" until I've seen them in the wild. An instruction will