Fixed a stack-size bug uncovered by a PUSH SS/POP SS sequence in Windows 95 kernel
This commit is contained in:
parent
e207cabc0a
commit
cb9e330cfa
4 changed files with 63 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ X86.opADDAX = function ADDAX()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPUSHES = function PUSHES()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO: Reportedly, when the OPERAND size is 32 bits, the 80386 will decrement the stack pointer by 4,
|
||||
* write the selector into the 2 lower bytes, and leave the 2 upper bytes untouched, whereas we will write
|
||||
* a 32-bit value, effectively zeroing the 2 upper bytes. Need to confirm this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.pushWord(this.segES.sel);
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPushSeg;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,6 +142,9 @@ X86.opPUSHES = function PUSHES()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPOPES = function POPES()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As discussed in fnRETF(), we temporarily set opLSP around operations that fnFault() may need to restart.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.opLSP = this.regLSP;
|
||||
this.setES(this.popWord());
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPopReg;
|
||||
|
|
@ -216,6 +224,11 @@ X86.opORAX = function ORAX()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPUSHCS = function PUSHCS()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO: Reportedly, when the OPERAND size is 32 bits, the 80386 will decrement the stack pointer by 4,
|
||||
* write the selector into the 2 lower bytes, and leave the 2 upper bytes untouched, whereas we will write
|
||||
* a 32-bit value, effectively zeroing the 2 upper bytes. Need to confirm this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.pushWord(this.segCS.sel);
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPushSeg;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -314,6 +327,11 @@ X86.opADCAX = function ADCAX()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPUSHSS = function PUSHSS()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO: Reportedly, when the OPERAND size is 32 bits, the 80386 will decrement the stack pointer by 4,
|
||||
* write the selector into the 2 lower bytes, and leave the 2 upper bytes untouched, whereas we will write
|
||||
* a 32-bit value, effectively zeroing the 2 upper bytes. Need to confirm this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.pushWord(this.segSS.sel);
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPushSeg;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -325,6 +343,9 @@ X86.opPUSHSS = function PUSHSS()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPOPSS = function POPSS()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As discussed in fnRETF(), we temporarily set opLSP around operations that fnFault() may need to restart.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.opLSP = this.regLSP;
|
||||
this.setSS(this.popWord());
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPopReg;
|
||||
|
|
@ -404,6 +425,11 @@ X86.opSBBAX = function SBBAX()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPUSHDS = function PUSHDS()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO: Reportedly, when the OPERAND size is 32 bits, the 80386 will decrement the stack pointer by 4,
|
||||
* write the selector into the 2 lower bytes, and leave the 2 upper bytes untouched, whereas we will write
|
||||
* a 32-bit value, effectively zeroing the 2 upper bytes. Need to confirm this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.pushWord(this.segDS.sel);
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPushSeg;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -415,6 +441,9 @@ X86.opPUSHDS = function PUSHDS()
|
|||
*/
|
||||
X86.opPOPDS = function POPDS()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As discussed in fnRETF(), we temporarily set opLSP around operations that fnFault() may need to restart.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.opLSP = this.regLSP;
|
||||
this.setDS(this.popWord());
|
||||
this.nStepCycles -= this.cycleCounts.nOpCyclesPopReg;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue