Retro/pcjs
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked pcjs
 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Playing with NASM

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Parsons 2015-04-04 12:35:36 -07:00 • committed by jeffpar
commit 96a39c9bbe
8 changed files with 15310 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
blog/2015/02/23/README.md
View file

@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ The only other information I have about revision levels comes from a March 30, 1
However, that document does not indicate how a 80386-C0 part was marked, and I've found very little other
information on the C0 stepping; it may have been quickly superseded by the D0 stepping, which used revision
identifier 0x05.
identifier 0x05. D1 and D2 steppings used identifier 0x08.
### Errata

2
blog/2015/03/26/README.md
View file

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ However, don't use that technique to check for optional parameters:
if (!parameter) { ... }
because a valid numeric parameter could include 0, a valid string parameter could include "", etc.
if a valid numeric parameter could include 0, or a valid string parameter could include "", etc.
Problems with type coercion are **NOT** problems caused by a poor choice of operators, so trying to make
those problems go away by artificially limiting your choice of operators seems like the wrong solution.