From 8cd37b58e949d77927822db21df4c0f75997cfbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Parsons Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:32:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Typos --- _posts/2016-02-24-remembering-compaq.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/_posts/2016-02-24-remembering-compaq.md b/_posts/2016-02-24-remembering-compaq.md index 3a6506b0b..0162da946 100644 --- a/_posts/2016-02-24-remembering-compaq.md +++ b/_posts/2016-02-24-remembering-compaq.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ IBM machines, it didn't force you to choose between a higher-quality text-only ( graphics-capable (CGA) display. COMPAQ improved on IBM's mutually-exclusive display choices by creating a monochrome display that could display both high-quality text *and* graphics. -IBM released their own portable unit a year later, but it looked suspciously COMPAQ-like, and it lacked COMPAQ's +IBM released their own portable unit a year later, but it looked suspiciously COMPAQ-like, and it lacked COMPAQ's innovative display. That tradition of innovation at COMPAQ continued for many years. Sometimes they even seemed *more* concerned about @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ since they are all machines I would like to see PCjs eventually support: + COMPAQ LTE Series (LTE 286, LTE 386) It's hard to stop at this point, because PCjs supports the 80386, and COMPAQ produced other 80386-based systems, -like those in the "LTE Lite" series. But I think I need to stick my original plan and draw a line at the end of the +like those in the "LTE Lite" series. But I think I need to stick to my original plan and draw a line at the end of the 1980s. ### Regarding The COMPAQ Name