Updated the MS-DOS 3.20 README
This commit is contained in:
parent
662ed5b819
commit
3466426d70
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
|||
MS-DOS 3.20
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The MS-DOS 3.20 floppies in the PCjs collection are the only known non-OEM disk images available online.
|
||||
All other known disk images are OEM releases (eg, HP, Zenith, Data General, Seiko Epson, etc.) and can
|
||||
be found on sites like [WinWorld](https://winworldpc.com/product/ms-dos/320).
|
||||
The MS-DOS 3.20 disks in the PCjs collection are the only known non-OEM copies of that release
|
||||
available online. All other known MS-DOS 3.20 disk images are OEM releases (eg, HP, Zenith, Data General,
|
||||
Seiko Epson, etc.) and can be found on sites like [WinWorld](https://winworldpc.com/product/ms-dos/320).
|
||||
|
||||
Disks 3 and 4 contained a printed date of `March 21, 1986` (see the photo below), which is consistent with
|
||||
the file timestamps (`2-14-86` and `3-14-86`) on those disks. However, all the files on Disks 1 and 2 are
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ the machine more or less unusable.
|
|||
Starting with the IBM PC Model 5160, Video BIOS function 0x0E ignores BH and always use the current page.
|
||||
|
||||
Microsoft must not have tested MS-DOS 3.20 on any 5150 machines, or if they did, those machines must have contained
|
||||
upgraded video cards, such as the EGA, which provided their own Video BIOS. This bug was fixed in MS-DOS 3.21,
|
||||
upgraded video cards, such as an EGA, which provided their own Video BIOS. This bug was fixed in MS-DOS 3.21,
|
||||
but that release apparently wasn't made available until almost a year later (MS-DOS 3.21 files are timestamped
|
||||
`5-01-87 12:00a`).
|
||||
`5-01-87`).
|
||||
|
||||
MS-DOS 3.20 Photos
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue