Added more info about DOS 2.0 BPBs
This commit is contained in:
parent
37e0e660c9
commit
20f8bdf141
2 changed files with 21 additions and 12 deletions
|
|
@ -541,14 +541,15 @@ DiskDump.aDefaultBPBs = [
|
|||
0x08, 0x00, // 0x16: sectors per FAT (8)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#BIOS_Parameter_Block) implies everything past
|
||||
// this point was introduced post-DOS 2.0. I think that's wrong, because I just formatted a diskette with PC-DOS 2.0
|
||||
// and it properly initialized the next 3 fields as well. TODO: Investigate PC-DOS 2.0 BPB behavior.
|
||||
// this point was introduced post-DOS 2.0. However, DOS 2.0 merely said they were optional, and in fact, DOS 2.0
|
||||
// FORMAT always initializes the next 3 words. A 4th word, LARGE_SECS, was added in DOS 3.20 at offset 0x1E,
|
||||
// and then in DOS 3.31, both HIDDEN_SECS and LARGE_SECS were widened from words to dwords.
|
||||
//
|
||||
0x11, 0x00, // 0x18: sectors per track (17)
|
||||
0x04, 0x00, // 0x1A: number of heads (4)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// PC-DOS 2.0 actually stored 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x00 here, so you can't always assume that anything past offset
|
||||
// 0x1E is part of the BPB. TODO: Investigate PC-DOS 2.0 BPB behavior.
|
||||
// PC-DOS 2.0 actually stored 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x00 here, so you can't rely on more than the first word.
|
||||
// TODO: Investigate PC-DOS 2.0 BPB behavior (ie, what did the 0x80 mean)?
|
||||
//
|
||||
0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 // 0x1C: number of hidden sectors (always 0 for non-partitioned media)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
@ -2652,10 +2653,10 @@ DiskDump.prototype.convertToJSON = function()
|
|||
if (iBPB >= 0) {
|
||||
if (fBPBExists) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In deference to the PC-DOS 2.0 anomaly noted above (see "Investigate PC-DOS 2.0 BPB behavior" above),
|
||||
* we limit the following byte verification to the offset of LARGE_SECS, less two bytes.
|
||||
* In deference to the PC-DOS 2.0 BPB behavior discussed above, we stop our BPB verification
|
||||
* after the first word of HIDDEN_SECS.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = DiskAPI.BPB.SECTOR_BYTES; i < DiskAPI.BPB.LARGE_SECS - 2; i++) {
|
||||
for (i = DiskAPI.BPB.SECTOR_BYTES; i < DiskAPI.BPB.HIDDEN_SECS + 2; i++) {
|
||||
var bDefault = DiskDump.aDefaultBPBs[iBPB][i];
|
||||
var bActual = this.bufDisk.readUInt8(offBootSector + i);
|
||||
if (bDefault != bActual) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -89,8 +89,9 @@ DiskAPI.DISK_FORMATS = {
|
|||
1474560: [80,2,18,,0xF0], // media type 0xF0: 80 cylinders, 2 heads (double-sided), 18 sectors/track, (2880 total sectors x 512 bytes/sector == 1474560)
|
||||
2949120: [80,2,36,,0xF0], // media type 0xF0: 80 cylinders, 2 heads (double-sided), 36 sectors/track, (5760 total sectors x 512 bytes/sector == 2949120)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following are some common partition sizes, which we explicitly map to CHS values, since the MBR and/or BPB
|
||||
* can mislead us when attempting to calculate total cylinders.
|
||||
* The following are some common partition sizes, which we explicitly map to CHS values, since MBR/BPB values
|
||||
* can mislead us when attempting to determine the exact disk geometry. TODO: Investigate. Is it possible that
|
||||
* usable space on early hard disks was reduced to reserve the last cylinder for diagnostics, head parking, etc?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
10618368:[306,4,17], // PC XT 10Mb hard drive (type 3)
|
||||
21368320:[615,4,17], // PC AT 20Mb hard drive (type 2)
|
||||
|
|
@ -152,7 +153,14 @@ DiskAPI.BOOT = {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* BIOS Parameter Block (BPB) offsets in DOS-compatible boot sectors (DOS 2.0 and up)
|
||||
* BIOS Parameter Block (BPB) offsets in DOS-compatible boot sectors (DOS 2.x and up)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTE: DOS 2.x OEM documentation says that the words starting at offset 0x018 (TRACK_SECS, TOTAL_HEADS, and HIDDEN_SECS)
|
||||
* are optional, but even the DOS 2.0 FORMAT utility initializes all three of those words. There may be some OEM media out
|
||||
* there with BPBs that are only valid up to offset 0x018, but I've not run across any media like that.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* DOS 3.20 added LARGE_SECS, but unfortunately, it was added as a 2-byte value at offset 0x01E. DOS 3.31 decided
|
||||
* to make both HIDDEN_SECS and LARGE_SECS 4-byte values, which meant that LARGE_SECS had to move from 0x01E to 0x020.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DiskAPI.BPB = {
|
||||
SECTOR_BYTES: 0x00B, // 2 bytes: bytes per sector (eg, 0x200 or 512)
|
||||
|
|
@ -165,8 +173,8 @@ DiskAPI.BPB = {
|
|||
FAT_SECS: 0x016, // 2 bytes: sectors per FAT (eg, 1)
|
||||
TRACK_SECS: 0x018, // 2 bytes: sectors per track (eg, 8)
|
||||
TOTAL_HEADS: 0x01A, // 2 bytes: number of heads (eg, 1)
|
||||
HIDDEN_SECS: 0x01C, // 4 bytes: number of hidden sectors (always 0 for non-partitioned media)
|
||||
LARGE_SECS: 0x020 // 4 bytes: number of sectors if TOTAL_SECS is zero (TODO: Verify the true extent of DOS 2.0 BPBs; they may have stopped with HIDDEN_SECS, which is what DiskDump assumes)
|
||||
HIDDEN_SECS: 0x01C, // 2 bytes (DOS 2.x) or 4 bytes (DOS 3.31 and up): number of hidden sectors (always 0 for non-partitioned media)
|
||||
LARGE_SECS: 0x020 // 4 bytes (DOS 3.31 and up): number of sectors if TOTAL_SECS is zero
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue